#BringBackOurGirls: The tweets that made the campaign viral

Tayo Elegbede - @tayojet1

April 14, 2014, the world received the news of the abduction of 279 school girls from the Chibok Government Secondary School in Borno State, Nigeria by the Boko Haram militant group.

Today, April 14, 2015, marks exactly one year since the abduction of the school girls.

Since the news of the abduction, the social media space has shown huge interest and commitment in demanding the safe return of the girls using the hashtag #BringBackOurGirls which has become viral, to say the least.

These are some tweets made the campaign viral and global:

#Malala stands in solidarity with Nigerians & people around the world calling for action to #BringBackOurGirls pic.twitter.com/VbnRePSDhd
— Malala Fund (@MalalaFund) May 3, 2014

#BringBackOurGirls. We repeat call for immediate release of Nigerian school girls. RT to stand with #Nigeria! pic.twitter.com/tH7F3IywYW
— UNICEF (@UNICEF) May 5, 2014

Our prayers are with the missing Nigerian girls and their families. It's time to #BringBackOurGirls. -mo pic.twitter.com/glDKDotJRt
— The First Lady (@FLOTUS) May 7, 2014

It can’t happen soon enough. #BringBackOurGirls pic.twitter.com/Jf97fQUd7N
— Ellen DeGeneres (@TheEllenShow) May 8, 2014

Let us all join in prayer for the immediate release of the schoolgirls kidnapped in Nigeria. #BringBackOurGirls
— Pope Francis (@Pontifex) May 10, 2014

#BringBackOurGirls pic.twitter.com/zYNp9YeYP0
— Emma Watson (@EmWatson) May 10, 2014

Proud to support #BringBackOurGirls. pic.twitter.com/Ge5wDPzCAO
— David Cameron (@David_Cameron) May 11, 2014

* Full report coming soon via www.smaafrica.com

Social Media and Governance in Africa

There is a debatable notion that nothing big and relevant happens in Africa without the influence of social media. While this assertion may not be absolutely correct, we are reminded of series of events that have unfolded mainly through and on social media platforms across the political, health, commercial and developmental landscape of the continent. 

Fresh on many minds is the role of social media in curtailing the spread of Ebola in the Western region of Africa, the widely-reported resignation of Burkina Faso’s President Blaise Compaore on social media, the Occupy movement which trailed across the Northern and Western regions of the continent, amongst other citizen led campaigns driven almost solely first on social media platforms before taking root in the offline society.

Accordingly to recent statistics released by We Are Social  – a global digital outfit, Africa, has about 293million active internet users , and about 103million active social media users across the continent.  While the latter figure may seem very large, it only represents 9 percent of the continent’s over 1.1billion offline population.

This year, about fifteen African countries will be at the polls. Only last two weekends, Africa’s most populous nation, Nigeria, held its presidential and national parliamentary elections, and expectedly, social media played a remarkable role in defining and redefining the concept of politicking and campaigning in a digitalized world as political parties and aspirants had a good run for their money online.

Prior to the general elections, which saw the emergence of General Muhammadu Buhari of the All Progressives Congress as the winner of the contest, several opinion polls were conducted on social media on the likelihood of whom will emerge Nigeria’s next president. 

Interestingly, about 70 percent of the polls reported that the General will most likely win. Today, General Buhari is the President-Elect. This is a testimonial that social media cannot be undervalued in any political contest or social context. To say the least, social media is here to stay!

The place of social media in Nigeria’s politics

Politics just as social media is a game of numbers. Nigeria has a huge population of young people constituting about 70 percent of the country’s average as well as the voting demography. Nigeria’s online population is also dominated by young people with varying degrees of interest, hence, to connect, engage and win young people, politicians saw the need to join the social media which is perceived to have an uninhibited communication process.

If anything, social media created an atmosphere of real-time communication flow, thus, allowing candidates to directly interact with voters and key influencers. In the Nigerian case study, we saw series of TweetChats, Hangouts, amongst other virtual events as audience engagement strategies. Whether or not the conversations were in most cases valid and successful remain an exploration for the nearest future.

The influence of social media on mainstream media is yet another reason political actors joined the social media conversation. In order to compete in a fast-paced media-based network of communities, journalists increasingly relied on political blogs, twitter conversations and various video and photo content as sources for their stories. Features such as iWitness reporting, citizens’ journalism on traditional media created a connection point for both the traditional and new media.

Comparatively, social media afforded stronger and better message delivery at relatively lower rates when compared to the cost of advertising on traditional media.

Given the extensive and multiplier effect of social media, there is no doubt that social media has clinched a formidable spot in nascent democracy and advancing politics and governance in Nigeria.

For one, I had a filled experience of virtual campaigning premised on interesting social media marketing ideologies. Tweetmeets, Hangouts, were the in thing within Nigeria’s online socio-political networks. Hashtags such as #MeetGEJ, #Febuhari, #MarchOutJonathan, #WhyIWillVoteGEJ, #MarchForBuhari, #GMB15, #LagosForYou, #iHaveDecided, were promoted by politicians and their supporters, while #NigeriaDecides, #Nigeria2015, #iPledgeToVote, #MyPVCNow #GoVote #VoteNotFight  #CourtNotStreet, were promoted by civil organisations to increase citizens’ awareness and participation in the electoral process.

Also worth noting is the idea of crowd funding via social media for political aspirants and their parties. This is indeed a trend to sustain and improve upon.

While social media allows multiple conversations of diverse focus at the same time, the Nigerian election has seen a shift in the level of discourse that has shaped the electioneering period. Through social media platforms, issues have come to the fore, though not explicitly ironed out; allegations and counter-allegations have been made, supporters of various political parties have probed various ideologies and campaign promises especially those of opposing parties whilst also making the conversations around the 2015 elections more engaging. 

These certainly provided a shift from what obtained during the 2011 polls.

Unfortunately, there were instances of inciting and hate speeches, which were not in the best interest of the country. In spite of the rapid growth of the social media space in Nigeria, anonymity is exploited and integrity not upheld therefore these gave room for the promotion of hate speech. In order to promote campaigns many faceless or anonymous handles were created littering the platforms with many profiles, which did not exist prior to the period in context. In some cases, real-time reportage suffered due to the promotion of half-truths and inaccurate information.

More worrisome was the coverage of election results and votes from polling units. These turned opposing individuals against one another in a rare display of intellectual arguments and numerical skills.

There is no gainsaying that the electioneering period has enhanced the financial base of most digital advertisers and many others involved in the value-chain of communicating and engaging the electorate in meaningful conversations online. From the marketer, to the publisher, writer, designer, et al, this electioneering era will sure be one to be remembered, if not for the financial benefits, at least for the experience and fun of the season.

A revolution is midway, social media has taken in the heart of Nigeria and Africa’s political and electioneering processes – all interested parties need to get rightly positioned.

The Power Of Networks

In recent times, the Internet has profoundly altered business operations across the globe more than ever in the history of mankind, making the art of social networking the next gale that will blow us forward.

Today, a generation of online tribes, cliques, communities, social spheres, lists, groups and circles, amongst others, describe and define online networks of interest and following.

As people connect with one another on Instagram in South Africa, others are navigating Facebook in Nigeria. Daily, large numbers of Africans and, indeed, the world are logging into thousands and perhaps millions of social networking platforms.

Social networks are predominately redefining our personal and business relationships with the world around us. From music to marketing, consulting to fashion, creative to communications, and education to engineering, there are available networks for every individual and professional to establish, join and develop for personal influence and brand benefits.

Human beings do not exist in isolation; they operate in circles of interests and relationships which, when virtual, can be referred to as networks. Networks exist both in business and social interactions, thereby making possible new avenues for insight and information sharing.

A network affords individuals and brands the opportunity to maintain stronger relationship with other individuals and brands of connected interest. It sets you up on knowing your customers and competitors, gives you the foresight to think, plan and execute any network-focused agenda while leveraging virtual reality.

One more trend is obvious: more offline relationships and networks are now migrating online and brands, just like individuals should position themselves for these opportunities. As an Internet and social media user, building networks and harnessing their benefits should depend on the platform in consideration. For instance, a photographer may find Instagram a better platform to build more viable network due to the fact that photos are better appreciated on Instagram or Pinterest.

In the same vein, a writer may find Tumblr or Twitter more interesting due to the opportunity to create long- or short-form essay. While this sounds like good advice, the popularity, acceptance and prevalent use of a network in a particular country is to be considered. A photographer on Instagram in a country where Facebook records the highest users may make the best use of the platform but lose out on business opportunities because many potential clients and customers are on other platforms.

To build a network for your brand is, perhaps, one of the most productive ways to constantly create relevant market buzz about your products and services. Network building goes beyond executing a one-off marketing campaign to helping your brand through its life cycle. In order to achieve this, it is crucial to look before leaping.

This second check will help in carrying out quick checks on competing brands already playing in your network and desired platform. It also gives opportunity to map out individuals who will be interested in your brand and how best to reach them.

The best place to begin when building a network is among friends and family members. These individuals will support you and offer positive reviews (at no cost or need for incentive). Thereafter, tap into their networks to reach more people. Leveraging connections from these two groups is often a good way to strengthen connection ties for stronger penetration. With second-degree connections, the first hurdle is crossed successfully.

Creating a communication or engagement structure by being sociable is at the heart of building and maintaining a valuable online network. Think of the external activities of the organisation promoting the social being of the brand, where customers can get a shareable message on subscribing for a particular service, purchasing a product or enjoying a specific service as well as receiving shareable birthdays or wedding anniversary messages from the organisations you patronise. These random and often-ignored activities greatly expand visibility, reach and size of networks.

Most importantly, it is vital to remember at all times that advocates – and not members – grow networks. So, having over 2,000 new followers is not a guaranteed network builder. Focus should be on having a trusted, valued and engaging community of people. These advocates constitute the surest way to build a network.

According to a consumer peer-influence report by Nielsen Study, 90 per cent of consumers trust peer recommendations, while only 33 per cent trust online ads. As a network manager, it is essential to find advocates for your brand and recruit new members to your social community aggressively, yet manually. Every new member is a potential community advocate if well engaged.

In growing a network, the concept of advocacy, as against influence(r), holds much value as influencers are paid for a one-off buzz, while advocates are life-long conscious ambassadors of the network or brand which, most times, comes without much financial constraints.

Hosting conversations on your social network is a sure way to engage, sustain and maintain your community of followers and advocates. Social conversations increase your network statistics, while positioning you as a thought leader and influencer within your industry.

You can embed social network feed widgets on your website to help visitors track activities on your social network without exiting your website. Tools such as Spot IM, Buffer and some browser extensions can help monitor and manage conversations on your social networks.

Giving back while giving a voice to your network members and advocates is crucial in winning them as well as winning with them. Create avenues for them to express their concerns and give back to them as a way of encouraging loyalty, support and partnership.

As with offline network creation and building, online networks require originality, conscious effort and creativity to win the time and treasure of potential members and advocates towards developing an empire of valuable individuals and brands for mutual excellence.

Networks are the most powerful characteristics of social media branding and profiling; therefore, build your networks deliberately.

In marketing campaign, clout could be deceptive

The Internet and social media provide the most impressive statistics about users. It is easy to get carried away by the figures and to dream of likes, follows and clicks when you are a regular user. Every brand visionary or social strategist thinks of opportunity the minute large numbers are mentioned.

The first thing to note is that the social media space – across all platforms – is a large interconnected network of individuals. Hence, the ‘social’ in the phenomenon called social media.

Just as observed in real life, people congregate in places that reflect common interests, associate with those who have similar values and bond with those they like.

It may, therefore, be a no-brainer not to notice that on every social media platform there are clouts. A clout refers to a circle of influence wielded by a personality or, in the case of virtual life, a profile or account. Clichés abound on the relevance and importance of clout and following in life. Every adult is sufficiently schooled on the importance of network in relation to friendships and character.

Many brands have followed this dogma hook, line and sinker; forgetting that business strategy should also consider reversing those thoughts.

A critical look at this implies that the peripheral overview of the strategy is to align brands with influencers – mostly celebrities – and trust their clout or influence to deliver attention, engagement and awareness for specific campaigns. This is where clout deception is revealed.

The concept of clout deception refers to the façade created largely by social media influencers who only have relative clout influence over a closed circle of networks.

The concept of social networks (which will be treated in subsequent articles) demystifies the impression that an account’s following or influence rating is all that is required to deliver campaign success. Clout deception is seen with brands that have adopted social media influencers as PR consultants or campaign drivers in order to deliver campaigns that otherwise should be wider and more pervasive in reach.

Look at this: An influencer of 500,000 followers may belong to more than two or three networks, such as brands, news/media and sports. In each of the networks, the actual clout power may be just average or even below average. While the overall clout counts, which is a different assessment from engagement, may be impressive, the capacity of the influencer to deliver the campaign is hampered due to the relatively low influence in each network.

This relationship explains the reason why much-anticipated campaigns fall flat, despite efforts to promote them. Clout deception happens daily on social media, just as the brand ambassadors often fail to deliver the needed results.

It is advisable for brands to consider both offline and online ambassadors for campaigns, while including influencers – who often do not have commensurate ‘star power’ to match the required attention. A clear delineation between being an ambassador and an influencer who only promotes a campaign should be made.

Increasingly, brands engage influencers to promote but expect activities of an ambassador and vice-versa leading to results that are far below expectations.

Clout deception is most experienced when influencers and their close circles ‘close trend’ a campaign, thus making it a trending topic albeit within closed circles.

For instance, while #thedress, #askhermore and #JeSuisCharlie trended globally, there was a thousand and more campaigns that trended locally yet delivered great results, though they made rounds in very few circles.

Brands must attempt to follow through their strategies by pinpointing campaigns such that they permeate many circles such as students, sports and professionals, not just a few circles.

The question any professional would ask is that the campaign strategy should have clear targets. And if these targets have been reached, it is expected that it will achieve an ‘agenda-setting’ objective.

This is mostly not the case because many other factors influence the capacity of a campaign to go viral.

According to Tai Tran, Social Media Marketing Manager, UC Berkerly/Haas School of Business, “Nobody actually knows what issue or campaign will go viral”.

It is important for brands to seek out and permeate a sea of opportunities in first-timers or newcomers on social media. The longer people exist (and actively too) on social media, the better they prioritise their attention, sieve through interests and cultivate preferences. Hence, rather than going after influencers and clout deception, reaching for ‘laggards’ according to Malcom Gladwell’s hierarchy of social adoption, costs much less and delivers greater results.

Another case in point is Ndani TV. With the seeming success recorded online, one should interrogate the essence for making the show an offline on television about two seasons after it commenced. The sheer reason of relatively poor Internet quality and paradox of Internet penetration may be obvious reasons that informed the need to maximise the investments made in delivering unique audiovisual content.

Is this strategy sustainable? Would a brand constantly go after new comers on social media to influence brand awareness and deliver campaigns? What happens to word-of-mouth and the seemingly large influence of influencers and celebrities on social media?

Remember, influencers exist to swing popular opinion largely from new comers.

##
First published on iPunch

Beyond Politics: The Value of Voting

Voting is not just a right; it is a sacred civic responsibility.

Few days from now, Nigerians above eighteen will have the opportunity to exercise their rights as citizens and cast their votes for the person(s) they think will best represent and guide them through the next four years and perhaps beyond.

This process – election is one of the fundamental tenets of representative democracy which is presupposed to transfer power from the citizenry to an elected few who in turn express the popular mandate of the citizenry for desired socio-economic, political and nationalistic benefits.

But, does it worth it, voting in Nigeria? Do votes really count? Do voters actually matter?...

Beyond its sheer political importance, voting matters to the governance structure of any society as well as the well-being of its citizenry. If well managed, it is the most peaceful transition tool for power in any society. It lays the foundation for citizens’ involvement in the political style of the nation and their basic engagement of relevant projects, policies and programmes. Voting covers both the short and long term values for societal development. Here are seven reasons to (value your) vote in the coming general election.

. Voting is the sure path to preserving and promoting our nascent democracy.  It creates the most open opportunity for eligible citizens to get involved in the democratic process of the Nigerian state.

. It matters both to the health of the Nigerian political system and to the people who participate in it. Voting cum election reflects the ups and downs of any society and government.

. Voting is our society’s prime equalizer.  No matter our stage in life, income power, religious persuasions, ethnic heritage or social status, every citizen over age eighteen (18) has the same power of one vote.

. Campaigns, pollsters do not determine who wins elections; voters do. Predicting the outcome of elections, especially close ones, is at best an inexact science. Pollsters, social and media analysts, political pundits have their roles, but like each of us, they only have one vote.

. Votes count. While how we vote is confidential, the fact that we have voted, or failed to vote, is public record. Elected officials know which individuals and demographic groups voted, and we who do vote are more likely to be influential in policy debates. Non-voters are voiceless and by not participating can become victims of their own neglect.

.  Regret is preventable. February is one month too late. Have a “no excuses” attitude by committing to vote, ask others to join us in voting and promote a positive approach to making a difference among family, friends and colleagues.

. Join in the making of history. Every indicator points to the prospect that this election will have impact for years, every vote is even more important. Being a participant in affecting history gives each of us a sense of pride in participation and the power to touch the future.

After all the words are said, charges levelled and millions of Naira spent, it’s we, the voters, who hold the power to decide who will lead our nation, our states and communities into the future.

Let’s Act Now!

Tayo Elegbede JET -@tayojet1

Freelance Journalist, Voiceover Artist and Mediapreneur.

--

TAYO ELEGBEDE JET

TECH SAVVY JOURNALIST 
MEDIAPRENEUR
COMMUNICATOR!

Twitter: @tayojet1
www.tayovoice.com
www.tayojet.blogspot.com

Media, Political Parties And Aspirants, Top Factors That Influence Nigerian Voters

A recent poll by NOIPolls Limited has revealed that the three main factors that affect the voting behaviour of Nigerian voters are “Political aspirants” (41%), “Political parties” (21%) and “Traditional media” (TV, radio & Newspapers) (19%).

This was contained in press statement released on Tuesday which also stated that more female respondents are influenced by “political aspirants” (46%) and “Political parties” (23%), while more male respondents are influenced by the “Traditional media” (23%).

Further findings revealed that almost 4 in 10 Nigerians (38%) of Nigerians are willing to accept a gift from a political party or aspirant if offered, and the majority (62%) would like to receive money as a gift. However when asked if the gift would influence their decisions, only 12% admitted a gift would certainly affect their voting decisions. Similarly, the willingness to accept a gift decreased with a progression in age since respondents aged between 18-21 years (65%) are most willing to accept a gift, and are also most likely to be influenced by a gift (43%) in their voting decisions.These were some of the key findings from the recent Countdown to the 2015 Election poll conducted in the week of June 16th 2014.

Brief Background
In Nigeria, there are internal and external factors that affect the voting decisions of citizens which in turn have implications on the overall outcome of elections. These are often the most crucial elements of elections in Nigeria because they are not limited to political parties, aspirants and the obligation of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) in conducting a free and fair election.
 
NOIPolls conducted its latest Countdown to the 2015 Election poll with a focus on factors that influence voting decisions during elections which could in turn affect the voters’ behaviour and the outcome of elections. The Countdown to the 2015 Election Polls are conducted bi-Monthly by NOIPolls; the first one was conducted in February 2014.

Nigerians Rate Jonathan's Performance 58%

Elegbede Tayo

President Goodluck Jonathan's job performance for the month of May has been rated 58 % by some Nigerian adults through a poll conducted by NOIPolls. 

Latest governance poll results released by NOIPolls for the month of May 2014 revealed that 58% of adult Nigerians approve of the job performance of the President over the past month; indicating a 9-point increase in his approval rating from April 2014 which stood at 49%. 

This rating represents the second highest in the 17-month period that NOIPolls has been conducting its monthly governance poll from January 2013.  The increase in the President’s approval rating was mainly as a result of the substantial increase observed in those that approve of the President’s performance in the South-East, South-South and South-West zones.

The President has maintained an average ranking in his performance on Economy, Education, Health, Agriculture & Food Security, Transportation and Foreign Policy; Diplomacy, while his performance on Job Creation, Power and Security remains very poor. Furthermore, in May 2014 more Nigerians (42%) experienced an overall improvement in power supply over the past one month as against 29% in April. The largest proportion of respondents who saw an improvement in their power supply were situated in the South-East and South-South zones; a marked 23-point and 20-point increase respectively, which also accounted for the highest positive rating for the President. Findings from the poll also indicate that though there has been an improvement in power supply for the month of May, Nigerians are still not satisfied with the quantity of power supply to their households. These are some of the key findings from the Governance Snap Poll conducted in week of May 26th 2014.

These results represent the fifth in the 2014 monthly series of governance polls conducted by NOIPolls to gauge the opinions and perceptions of Nigerians regarding the approval rating of the President, the performance of the President on key elements of his transformation agenda, and the state of power supply in the country.

Respondents to the poll were asked three specific questions. The first question sought to assess the opinion of Nigerians on the performance of President Goodluck Jonathan over the past 1 month. Respondents were asked: Do you approve or disapprove of the job performance of President Jonathan in the past 1 month? The results depicts that the majority (58%: 46%+12%) of Nigerians approve of the president’s performance; where 46% approve and 12% strongly approve of the President’s performance. A total of 26% (21%+5%) of respondents indicated disapproval of the president’s performance while 16% remain neutral as they neither approve nor disapprove.

Examining the President’s performance by geo-political zones reveals that the South-East zone (90%: 26%+64%) has the highest proportion of respondents who approve of the President’s job performance. The North-West zone accounts for the largest ratio of respondents that were neutral and disapprove of the president’s job performance with 27% and 38% respectively.

It is pertinent to note that there was a considerable 21-points; 16-point and 12-point increase in the proportion of Nigerians from the South-East, South-South and South-West zones respectively who approve of the President’s performance in May from April. Similarly, there was a substantial 14-point decrease in the proportion of Nigerians from the North-West zone who disapprove of the president’s performance from April (52%) to May (38%).